Playing with a STANAG-4285 signal and SA (Signals Analayzer) I met some problems in understanding correctly the synchronization sequence pattern of this waveform: the solution is very simple indeed and must be sought in the way the SA phase-plane module demodulator works. Below the story.
"The synchronization phase of the STANAG-4285 waveform consists of 80 symbols and is transmitted recurrently every 106.6 ms. This sequence uses 2-bit phase shift keying (2-PSK) modulation and the modulation rate is equal to 2400 bauds. The sequence is identical to a pseudorandom sequence of length 31, which is repeated periodically within the 80-symbol window, i.e., the synchronization sequence consists of 2 periods of length 31 plus the first 18 symbols of another period. A generator for the synchronization sequence is described in pic. 1. The generator polynomial is: x^5 + x^2 +1.
The scrambling operation is carried out on reference and data symbols only, not on the synchronization sequence."
At the beginning of every frame the generator is initially set to the following value: 11010. The first symbol of the synchronization sequence is identical to the least significant bit of this initial value. The remaining 79 symbols are obtained by applying the clock 79 times.
The scrambling operation is carried out on reference and data symbols only, not on the synchronization sequence."
![]() |
pic. 1 - S-4285 sync sequence generator |
Coding into 8-ary is achieved by mapping one-bit to one-symbol according to the following rule in pic. 2: "000" for bit "0" (symbol 0) and "100" for bit "1" (symbol 4)
![]() |
pic. 2 - coding 04 |
Such sync sequence generator can be simulated running a simple Lua program: since the sync sequence is not subjected to the scrambling, the output file generated by the program is just the STANAG-4285 sync sequence that we want. The pattern of the sync sequence is visible using the BEE bitstream analyzer (pic. 3).
![]() |
pic. 3 - sync sequence pattern (mapping 0-4) |
Curiously, looking at a real world STANAG-4285 signal demodulated by SA phase-plane, its 80 symbols sync sequence has a different pattern than the one expected (pic. 4)
Inspecting the same sync sequence of a STANG-4285 modem, an orignal and clean signal, things seem even worse (pic. 5)
![]() |
pic. 5 - sync sequence pattern of a S4285 modem |
The interesting matter is that editing the mapBit() function of the Lua code as below:
local function mapBit(Ubit)
if (Ubit == "0") then
8ary_symbol = {"1","1","1"} -- # symbol number 7
else
8ary_symbol = {"0","1","1"} -- # symbol number 3
end
return 8ary_symbol
end
end
we can get the same sync sequence pattern of the modem sample just by using the mapping 7-3 rather than 0-4, which is equivalent to add a negative π/4 phase rotation to the original mapping 0-4 (pics 6,7)
![]() |
pic. 6 |
Same conclusions for the over-the-air (real world) STANAG-4285 signal: in this case the used mapping is 4-0, equivalent to a π phase rotation or phase opposition (pics 8,9)
local function mapBit(Ubit)
if (Ubit == "0") then
8ary_symbol = {"1","0","0"} -- # symbol number 4
else
8ary_symbol = {"0","0","0"} -- # symbol number 0
end
return 8ary_symbol
end
end
![]() |
pic. 8 |
![]() |
pic. 9 |
The reason of the above incongruencese between the expected pattern and the obtained ones, is very simple: SAis a signal analyzer and nota decoder (and Ihadforgotten!).
Being part of an analyzer, the SA phase-plane module uses a sort of "universal demodulator" that does not match any particular protocol to exactly sync its demodulator, as it happens instead in STANAG-4285 (for example) "suited" decoders such as Sorcerer, Sigmira and many others. In other words, SA phase-plane demodulator is not synchronized with the waveform being analyzed and the resulting phase-offset may cause different (fake) results for the same waveform. So, the more the phase values, the more the variants that the demodulator produces: for example, in case of a π/4 DQPSK modulation 24 different decodings are possible, and it isn't surely the worst case.
Working phase keyed signals, the SA phane-plane demodulator produces correct interpretations and view under a "quantitative" profile (number of phases, angles, modulation speed, carrier frequency,...) but uncertain results under a qualitative (demod) one.